Which statement about the relationship between hazard and survival is true?

Study for the ACVPM Epidemiology and Biostatistics Exam. Prepare with flashcards and multiple choice questions, with hints and explanations for each. Be exam-ready!

Multiple Choice

Which statement about the relationship between hazard and survival is true?

Explanation:
Hazard is the instantaneous risk of the event at time t for those still at risk, while the survival function S(t) is the probability of remaining event-free up to time t. The key link is that the rate at which the survival probability decreases is proportional to both the number still at risk (S(t)) and the instantaneous hazard h(t). This gives the ordinary differential equation dS/dt = -h(t) S(t). Put simply, the slope of the survival curve at any time t is determined by how high the hazard is and how many people are still at risk. This relationship also explains why the survival function can be expressed in terms of the cumulative hazard H(t) = ∫0^t h(u) du: S(t) = exp(-H(t)). If the hazard is constant, S(t) declines exponentially as S(t) = e^{-h t}, assuming S(0) = 1. Why the other statements don’t fit: the hazard is not simply the derivative of survival; in fact, the derivative of survival is -h(t) times S(t). The survival function is not the integral of hazard; that integral yields the cumulative hazard, not survival. And hazard is not equal to the survival probability, since they measure different things with different units.

Hazard is the instantaneous risk of the event at time t for those still at risk, while the survival function S(t) is the probability of remaining event-free up to time t. The key link is that the rate at which the survival probability decreases is proportional to both the number still at risk (S(t)) and the instantaneous hazard h(t). This gives the ordinary differential equation dS/dt = -h(t) S(t). Put simply, the slope of the survival curve at any time t is determined by how high the hazard is and how many people are still at risk.

This relationship also explains why the survival function can be expressed in terms of the cumulative hazard H(t) = ∫0^t h(u) du: S(t) = exp(-H(t)). If the hazard is constant, S(t) declines exponentially as S(t) = e^{-h t}, assuming S(0) = 1.

Why the other statements don’t fit: the hazard is not simply the derivative of survival; in fact, the derivative of survival is -h(t) times S(t). The survival function is not the integral of hazard; that integral yields the cumulative hazard, not survival. And hazard is not equal to the survival probability, since they measure different things with different units.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy